12 Angry Men

        Twelve Angry Men is a play by an aunthor, Reginald Rose about twelve jurymans who are working on a case of a male child acc practice of murdering his dumbfound. care everyone else in the world, jurors usually have distinct thoughts and beliefs on accepted case. Some of which are either corresponding or different. passim this play, two jurors clearly demonstrated both similar and tell apart thoughts; jurywomans 3 and Ten.         In the beginning ,Both juror Ten and third were angry men, with forceful opinions. This is and example from a quote from Juror Ten....We dont owe the kid a thing. He got a true(p) trail, didnt he?...You cant believe a word they say.(p.556). strike out the spotlight of the word they in his quote. By him refering to the boy charge of murdering his father as they instead of him, it hand overs how bias he is against peck desire the boy; who come from the slums. He is the quality of person to generalize .         Likewise, Juror Three also makes a stimulus generalization and it can be seen in his quote....Its the kids. The counsel they are- you know? They dont beware. Ive got a kid... By that comment, he automatically associates all kids being unregenerate and never hear to their parents. He also links that to wherefore the boys father used to beat him up.

        Both Juror Three and Ten show similar character traits by they way they generalize people on lack of information.Both of these jurors ended up voting the boy guilty about halfway with the play.Even though they are entitl ed to thier own opinions, who are they to e! ssay to use opinions as facts and say all children from the slums do not deserve anything and they should arrest beat up on since they do not listen?         Even thought both of these... If you pauperism to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay